LIMITATION OF REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS BY FOOD AVAILABILITY AND BREEDING TIME IN PIED FLYCATCHERS

Ecology ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 1789-1796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pirkko Siikamäki
Ecoscience ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marko Mägi ◽  
Raivo Mänd ◽  
Heleri Tamm ◽  
Elo Sisask ◽  
Priit Kilgas ◽  
...  

Ecology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 1084-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leticia Vieyra ◽  
Enriqueta Velarde ◽  
Exequiel Ezcurra

Ecology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 91 (12) ◽  
pp. 3515-3525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian J. Rickard ◽  
Jari Holopainen ◽  
Samuli Helama ◽  
Samuli Helle ◽  
Andrew F. Russell ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 267 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. M. Pyk ◽  
A. Bunce ◽  
F. I. Norman

The influence of age on reproductive success and diet was examined in ‘old’ (experienced; 12 years and older) and ‘young’ (5–8 years of age) Australasian gannets (Morus serrator) breeding at Pope’s Eye, Port Phillip Bay, Victoria during the 2002–2003 breeding period. Although food availability, as indicated by commercial fish catches, throughout this breeding period was low, there were no significant differences in breeding success or chick growth between groups. Nevertheless, old birds tended to have higher reproductive success, replacing more lost eggs and fledging chicks of a greater mass. However, old birds also laid more eggs that failed to hatch. Five fish species, including jack mackerel (Trachurus declivis), barracouta (Thyrsites atun), redbait (Emmelichthys nitidus), anchovy (Engraulis australis) and red mullet (Upeneichthys vlamingii), were important in the gannet diet during this breeding period. There were no significant differences in dietary parameters, including range of species and size of prey, between old and young gannets, nor were there any differences between those of the chicks and their parents, suggesting that adults do not forage selectively for their chicks. This study showed that even during a period of presumed low food availability, when experienced (older) birds might be expected to have enhanced success, the differences between these and less experienced (younger) birds may not be apparent.


2018 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 177-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivam Swamy ◽  
Xiaobin Xie ◽  
Ayaka Kukino ◽  
Haley E. Calcagno ◽  
Michael R. Lasarev ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 363 (1490) ◽  
pp. 399-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Verhulst ◽  
Jan-Åke Nilsson

Reproductive success usually declines in the course of the season, which may be a direct effect of breeding time, an effect of quality (individuals with high phenotypic or environmental quality breeding early), or a combination of the two. Being able to distinguish between these possibilities is crucial when trying to understand individual variation in annual routines, for instance when to breed, moult and migrate. We review experiments with free-living birds performed to distinguish between the ‘timing’ and ‘quality’ hypothesis. ‘Clean’ manipulation of breeding time seems impossible, and we therefore discuss strong and weak points of different manipulation techniques. We find that the qualitative results were independent of manipulation technique (inducing replacement clutches versus cross-fostering early and late clutches). Given that the two techniques differ strongly in demands made on the birds, this suggests that potential experimental biases are limited. Overall, the evidence indicated that date and quality are both important, depending on fitness component and species, although evidence for the date hypothesis was found more frequently. We expected both effects to be prevalent, since only if date per se is important, does an incentive exist for high-quality birds to breed early. We discuss mechanisms mediating the seasonal decline in reproductive success, and distinguish between effects of absolute date and relative date, for instance timing relative to seasonal environmental fluctuations or conspecifics. The latter is important at least in some cases, suggesting that the optimal breeding time may be frequency dependent, but this has been little studied. A recurring pattern among cross-fostering studies was that delay experiments provided evidence for the quality hypothesis, while advance experiments provided evidence for the date hypothesis. This indicates that late pairs are constrained from producing a clutch earlier in the season, presumably by the fitness costs this would entail. This provides us with a paradox: evidence for the date hypothesis leads us to conclude that quality is important for the ability to breed early.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document